__________________________________________________Court File No. ___________
PLAINTIFFS' SECOND SET OF
William N. Matthews
Solid Rock Church, Inc.
Defendants
______________________________________________________________________________
Terrence J. Fleming and William F. Stute, Attorneys for Defendants
Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L.P., 4200 IDS Center, 80 South Eight Street,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404-2205.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICEthat, pursuant to Rule 36.01 of the Minnesota Rules
of Civil Procedure, you are requested and required to furnish answers to the following
Requests for Admissions to Edward G. Palmer ("Plaintiff") within thirty (30) days from
the date of service. The answer shall specifically deny the matter or set forth in detail the
reasons why the Defendants cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter.
DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
1. These admission requests should be answered in accordance with the
Definitions and Instructions set forth in Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories to
Defendants and the additional Definitions provided in Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests for
2. These requests for admissions are deemed to be continuing. If defendants,
defendants' attorneys or defendants' agents obtain any other information which would
add to, modify, or qualify your responses supplied herein, you are directed, pursuant to
Minn. R. Civ. P. 26.05, to give timely notice of such information and furnish the same to
3. You are required to answer these Requests for Admission by either stating that
you Admit or Deny the statement. Defendants may not give lack of information or
knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless Defendants states that a
reasonable inquiry has been made and that the information known or readily obtainable
by Defendants is insufficient to enable the party to admit or deny.
4. Any matter admitted pursuant to this rule is conclusively established unless the
Court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission. Any admission
made by Defendants is for the purpose of the pending action only and is not an
admission by Defendants for any other purpose nor may it be used against Defendants
in any other proceeding. See Minn. R. Civ. P. 36.02.
5. This second set of Requests for Admissions concerns Plaintiffs' Exhibits 1-5
which are attached hereto and the Articles of Incorporation filings at the Minnesota
Secretary of State's Office.
6. To avoid duplicate request for admission numbers and the confusion inherent
therein, the numbering of the attached requests for admissions are continued from the
number forty-four (44), which was the ending number in Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests
for Admissions. Therefore, the first number in this Second Request for Admissions is the
REQUEST NO. 45: Admit that the resolution attached hereto as Plaintiffs'
Exhibit No. 1 is an exact copy of the resolution used by Defendants to change the name
of the organization from the Elk River Assembly of God Church to the name of Solid
Rock Church at the meeting held on July 1, 1993.
REQUEST NO. 46: Admit that the resolution shown as Exhibit No. 1 is the
absolute only resolution that was presented to the members of the organization for
consideration at the business meeting held on July 1, 1993.
REQUEST NO. 47: Admit that Plaintiffs' Exhibit No. 2 is an exact copy of
Defendants' Meeting Notice supplied for the organization's business meeting scheduled
REQUEST NO. 48: Admit that Defendants dated the notice shown as Exhibit
No. 2 (meeting notice) September 20, 1994 which was only nine (9) days prior to the
scheduled business meeting held on September 29, 1994.
REQUEST NO. 49: Admit that the notice shown as Exhibit No. 2 specifies that
changes will be made to "Article XII - Property" of the Articles of Incorporation.
REQUEST NO. 50: Admit that the notice shown as Exhibit No. 2 identifies no
other changes to the Articles of Incorporation.
REQUEST NO. 51: Admit that Defendants filed a change with the Minnesota
Secretary of State under oath to Article V as a result of the September 29, 1994 business