MN. Prior to releasing the information contained in my report, I had the entire content reviewed
by other members who will attest to the veracity of my statements. In addition, I am in
possession of written documents and audio tapes that will also support the veracity of my
statements. Even as I write, copies of Mr. Matthews' taped messages are being collected and
transcribed. I am also in direct contact with prior staff members who will verify the veracity of
my statements. They will also attest to how Mr. Matthews lied to them.

My rhetorical question about liquidating the church property was just that, rhetorical. You
assume dissolution. However, we all know that Mr. Matthews can simply trade assets for other
assets and keep his now "very elite" non-profit corporation rolling a long time for the benefit of
his family. We all also know that it will be a long time before the IRS would ever catch up.
Knowledge is powerful;even to those with dishonorable intentions.

A "brother" is defined in Matthew 12:50. "For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is
my brother . . ."(also in Mark 3:35)God's Word also defines who the children of God are.
"This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are:
Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God . . ." 1 John 3:10Further, and in 1
Corinthian 5:11, the Word says: "But now I am writing you that you must not associate with
anyone who calls himself a brother but is . . . greedy . . . a swindler. With such a man do not even
eat."A definition of a swindler according to the American Heritage Dictionary is "to cheat or
defraud of money or property" or "to obtain by fraudulent means."

Despite what you or others that support him may believe, Mr. Matthews is NOT a brother in
Christ. His actions speak otherwise and it is God's Word that condemns him, not I. I am
entirely at peace with God over this matter. The actions that I take are those that the FATHER
tells me to take. It has been that way for 19 years.

Would you argue in a courtroom that the members freely and knowingly gave up their rights to
the "one member-one vote rule" under Minnesota's Non-Profit Corporation Law based upon this
single resolution that Mr. Matthews presented to us? I can tell you that no members voted to
disenfranchise themselves. I can tell you that at no point were any members even appraised of
this requirement of the AFCM. I was there! I voted, like others, to switch "accountability"
entities.

Godly Wisdom, Spiritual Abuse or Cult?

Page 71